News Articles Internet
Articles (2012)
|
Tax
Armageddon is on its way...Massive On Thursday, June 28 most Americans stopped what they were doing at 10 a.m. to watch as the US Supreme Court announced its decision concerning the constitutionality of Obamacare. Americans held their breath waiting to hear whether or not the individual mandatewhich would have forced every person in the country to buy health insurancewas constitutional. If the individual mandate was ruled unconstitutional, it wouldor, at least, should havespelled doom for Obamacare. Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote the majority opinion, found that the individual mandate was unconstitutional because the Commerce Clause in the Constitution does not give Congress the right to punish people for not engaging in commerce. That should have ended Obamacare. Justice Roberts then did what the Constitution does not allow him to dohe rewrote Obamacare as a tax. Clearly, this was something Congress very deliberately avoided doing. No where in the 2,409 pages of HR3200 is Obamacare called a tax. No where in the 2,409 pages is the word "tax" even mentioned. The "fine" in the individual mandate can't be a tax since constitutionally (Article I, Section 2), taxes must be equally apportionedyou can't tax some people for their conduct and not tax everyone. By its nature, John Roberts' "tax" is still a finewhich is what Congress intended. To give Obamacare a semblance of constitutionality, Roberts called a "fine" a tax, and declared it constitutional. Chief Justice John Roberts, in making an accommodation for Obama, violated his oath of office and created an impeachable offense. By rewriting just one word in the Obamacare languagecalling the "individual mandate fine" a tax, Roberts did something no other Supreme Court Justice in the history of the United States has donehe wrote a completely new tax law that did not exist before the high court visited the individual mandate. Congress very deliberately did not intend that the individual mandate be called a tax. The Democrats who voted for it made it clear to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid they would vote it down if the individual mandate was a tax. John Roberts' sleight-of-hand created what in 1775 would have been called "An Intolerable Act." The Intolerable Acts were the catalysts that started the American Revolution. The high court lacks the prerogative of rewriting legislation. It isn't their job. The role of writing law is the sole prerogative of the Legislative Branch. The sole role of the high court is to determine what Congress intended to do through the language of the law, and rule accordingly.) Congress fully intended that the individual mandate to be enforced with a fine for nonparticipation. Once the individual mandate was found to be unconstitutional, the high court had only one recourse open to themstriking the mandate from the law. This was not a matter of judicial discretion by Roberts. Roberts very deliberately went out of his way to very specifically help Barack Obama save Obamacare through political meddling. . Roberts wrote a new tax law by changing one word. That one word has a one trillion dollar price tag. What's more, the health insurance tax, assessed on those who refuse to purchase health insurance, will impact low income families. But, that's only the start. Here are some of the new taxes which h would have died with Obamacare, that John Robertswho has no taxing authorityjust passed on to the American people. You might say his one word tax law has a price tag of about one and a half trillion dollars and growing. The new taxes emanating from Obamare below were found in one day. I expect they actually present less than 5% of the new taxes birthed by the illicit relationship between John Roberts and Barack Obama.
Remember what Barack Obama said when he was campaigning for the White House in 2008and remember what he continues to parrot today, running for election in 2012 (I cannot honestly saying "running for reelection" because when you steal 35 million votes to get the keys to the White House in 2008, I don't think you can call Obama's hope of winning his first genuine victory can be termed "reelection" But, back to the point. Obama's primary campaign promises in 2008 and again in 2012: "I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250 thousand a year will see any form of tax increase. Not on your payroll tax. Not on your capital gains taxes. Not on any of your taxes. If you earn less than a quarter million dollars a year you will not see your taxes increase a single dime." And, true to his word, no one's taxes were raised by a dime. Just 16 days after his inauguration, Obama hiked the tax on cigarettes by 156%. But then, in fairness, he never promised not to raise the tax on your smokes. In case you're wonderingthe median income of US smokers is $37,000about $213 thousand below Obama's no new taxes pledge. The only thing he didn't say was "Read my lips." Well, for whatever it's worth, once again, you have my two cents worth on this subject. Until next time...
|
|
|