Home
News
Behind the Headlines
Two-Cents Worth
Video of the Week
News Blurbs
Short
Takes
Plain
Talk
The
Ryter Report
DONATIONS
Articles
Testimony
Bible Questions
Internet Articles (2015)
Internet Articles (2014)
Internet
Articles (2013)
Internet Articles (2012)
Internet Articles (2011)
Internet Articles (2010)
Internet Articles
(2009)
Internet Articles (2008)
Internet Articles (2007)
Internet Articles (2006)
Internet Articles (2005)
Internet Articles (2004)
Internet Articles (2003)
Internet Articles (2002)
Internet Articles (2001)
From
The Mailbag
Books
Order
Books
Cyrus
Rednecker
Search
About
Comments
Links
![](https://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=VkbyvTtBAtA&bids=79219.10000074&type=4&subid=0)
![](../IMAGE/122x458-FOMoffer.jpg)
![](https://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=VkbyvTtBAtA&bids=56180.10000032&type=4&subid=0) ![](https://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=VkbyvTtBAtA&bids=77305.10000568&type=4&subid=0) ![](https://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=VkbyvTtBAtA&bids=79676.10000009&type=4&subid=0) ![](https://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=VkbyvTtBAtA&bids=39892.10000004&type=4&subid=0) ![](https://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=VkbyvTtBAtA&bids=82744.10000008&type=4&subid=0) ![](https://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=VkbyvTtBAtA&bids=35492.10000093&type=4&subid=0) ![](https://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=VkbyvTtBAtA&bids=78067.10000047&type=4&subid=0) ![Openings at $75K to $500K+](https://www.awltovhc.com/image-3856740-10641688)
![Pinnaclemicro 3 Million Computer Products](https://www.awltovhc.com/image-3856740-10811575)
![Startlogic Windows Hosting](https://www.awltovhc.com/image-3856740-10398474)
![Adobe Design Premium¨ CS5](https://www.lduhtrp.net/image-3856740-10589167)
![Get Your FREE Coffeemaker Today!](https://www.lduhtrp.net/2i108z15u-yJNSPQROKJLKPOKMKR)
![Corel Store](https://www.awltovhc.com/image-3856740-10694254)
![](https://www.tqlkg.com/k277xjnbhf049678510218A47A4)
![20 years](../IMAGE/Bringing_sm.jpg)
|
aseball
uses designated hitters and runners. Politicsat least since 1912has
used its own designated winner and losers. Baseball teams use designated
hitters and runners to strengthen the odds that they will win the game.
Politics designates the winner and losers for the same reason. Only in
politics, the stakes are much higher with the major players coughing up
the hundreds of millions of dollars needed to play a few hands in America's
greatest past-time. And, that past-time ain't baseball. It's politics.
Politics with international implications. And, the stakes have never been
bigger than they are this year. At stake is world government. Not just
anyone will promise the world's most powerful bankers, industrialists
and merchant princes that they are willing to surrender American sovereignty
. They must have enough lack of moral character to actually be willing
to sell out the people of the United States of America for the pot of
gold at the end of the rainbowlike Bill and Hillary Clinton
did when they signed NAFTA into law, or what George W. Bush did
when he signed CAFTA into law. Since the Clintons have already
been tested under fire and have been proven willing to surrender America's
job base for money and power, Hillary Clinton became the defacto
media-ordained front-runner in the 2008 Race for the White House
before the race even began. But, I'm getting ahead of myself.
Before we look
at this season's designated winner and losers, we
need to take a minute and look back on how this game startedand
who are the invisible "umpires" who referee the game called
politics from the sidelinesout of sight of the spectators who actually
believed the game is honestly played.
A
year before the Election of 1912, New Jersey Gov. Thomas Woodrow Wilson
suggested that President William Howard Taft appoint a board of
savvy businessmen and bankers led by J.P. Morgan to oversee the
financial compass of the nation. Wilson was of the opinion that
bankers were more qualified than politicians to steer the US ship-of-State
away from the shoals of economic mishap like the Bank Panic of 1907
in which the stock market lost approximately 50% of its value. (The Panic
of 1907 was blamed on the crash of the British bank, Baring & Company
in Oct., 1906 caused by bad investments by one of its banks, Arbuthnot
& Company. The
Panic of 1907 was actually a "local" event staged by
Morgan in the summer of 1907.) Morgan leaked a story to
several of the nation's largest newspapers that the Knickerbocker Bank
in New York was insolvent. This started a run not only on the Knickerbocker
Bank, but hundreds of other banks, first in New York and then across
the nation. The purpose of the rumor-mongering was to do accomplish precisely
what happened. Create a financial catastrophe that Congress would be forced
to address. The solution? Create a central banking system to protect the
American consumers from insolvent banks.
The
plus in the Bank Panic of 1907 was a political opportunist named
Woodrow Wilson. Col. Edward Mandall House, one of Morgan's
key aides (with family ties to the Rothschild family in Europe),
told Morgan that he believed Wilson would make an ideal
President because the former Princeton president would be putty in their
handshe would take orders. Morgan liked the idea well enough
to send House to feel out the governor and see if Wilson
wanted the job bad enough to work with Morgan. Wilson agreed.
The first step to the White House was the appointing of Col. House
as Wilson's key adviser.
The job of electing Wilson,
however, was not going to be that easy. JP Morgan polled the American
people several times in 1911-12. The polls suggested Wilson was
unelectable. He couldn't pull more than 40% of the vote regardless which
Democrat he faced for the nomination. House Speaker Champ Clark
was the Democratic favorite that year. Without interference, he would
most likely win the nomination.
President William Howard
Taft, the polls said, was a shoo-in for reelection regardless who
he ran against. Morgan and the money cartel manipulated the election
by backing every candidate that year except Eugene V. Debs, the
socialist. They secretly funded Wilson's campaign and openly supported
both Champ Clark in the primaryand their own third party
candidate, popular former president Teddy Roosevelt whom they knew
would pull the conservative vote away from Taft and throw the election
to Wilson. At least, that's what the honest, in-house polls told
them. In the end, Wilson took the 41.8% of the vote the pollsters
said he would get. Morgan's third party candidate, Teddy Roosevelt,
took 27.4% of the vote, and Taftwho the pollsters in 1911
said would win with 55% of the vote, came in third, taking only 23.2%
of the popular voteand only one State. Roosevelt won 6 states.
Wilson, the man who couldn't win, took 41 states. The Money
Mafia knew they could always pick the designated winner if they controlled
the designated losers.
The Money
Mafia had a lot riding on the Election of 1912. First were the successful
ratification of the 16th and 17th Amendments that would [a] give
the federal government the right to impose an income tax on the American
people and [b] remove the States from the equation of federal power.
(That
would prevent the States from killing legislation that would increase
the power of the central governmentand its ability to surrender
the nation's sovereignty to the League of Nations whenever they felt the
time was right.) And second was the central bank that was promised to
JP Morgan by Wilson if the governor won the White House.
Morgan was determined to make sure he did.
More special interest money
changed hands in American politics from 1906 to 1912 than it did in any
decade in the 20th century until the 1970s when TV became the expensive
paid venue for delivering the political message to the voters. Wilson
sold out the United States twice during his 8-year reign. First, Congress
helped the bankers violate the Constitution by surrendering their right
to create the nation's money supply to private bankers. Wilson
kept his promise to Morgan and signed the Federal Reserve Act
of 1913 into law on Dec. 23, 1913. On Jan. 18, 1918 in an address
to Congress Wilson outlined his 14 Points (which were the cornerstone
of the Treaty of Versailles). The 14th point was the foundation
of the League of Nations. World government was on track.
When Wilson and House
structured the 14 Points, House assured Wilson he would
become the first president of the worldproviding the League of
Nations was ratified by the US Senate before he left office on March
3, 1921. (The Senate had already rejected the Treaty of Versailles
in May, 1920 because all signatory nations would be required to surrender
sovereignty and submit to the authority and jurisdiction of the League
of Nations in Brussels.) Knowing the League of Nations was bad for America,
Wilson still took a whistlestop train tour across the nation to
sell America's yokels that the League of Nations was a good deal.
America never joined the League of Nations, but thanks to FDR,
we got suckered into the United Nations.
The plan to create world government
began when the Money
Mafia realized they could manipulate America's national elections
and actually place into office whomever they wantedwith the American
people none the wiser. And, since the Election of 1912, the Money
Mafia has picked the designated winner and the designated losers
of every race except two. In 1964 Lyndon Johnson was not the choice
of the money barons who viewed Johnson as a political thug. In
1980 the transnationals picked New Worlder George H.W. Bush, but
the media could not convince the American voter that Bush was the
frontrunner because the working classon both sides of the aislehad
already decided they were voting for Ronald Reagan. Reagan
set the timeline for world government back 30 years.
To the average American consumer
it does not appear logical to believe that a handful of wealthy bankers
and industrialists can manipulate the elective process with any degree
of certainty since, in the final analysis, it's the votermany of
whom don't even make up their mind until they enter the voting boothwho
actually casts their vote for the winner and, by default, the losers.
The
field of candidates is manipulated by the media which force feeds the
consumer with the standings of the designated winners from both partiesi.e.,
the frontrunners. You are told they are the frontrunner by virtue of the
fact that they have raised more money than then those who are termed second
or third tier candidates (i.e., the immediate designated losers) whom
you are encouraged not to talk about or vote for since, in media logic,
since the big city bankers and transnational industrialists are not filling
their pockets with money, they haven't a prayer of winning since we all
know it costs millions of dollars to wage a political campaign.
If push comes to shove, and
the media has not actually pivoted the "frontrunner" into the
lead vote-getter with a sufficient safety margin in the polls, jury-tampering
ensues. Jury-tamperingsince the voters are the jury that theoretically
determines which candidate wins and losesconsists of rigging electronic
voting machines to overcount or undercount ballots to guarantee a predetermined
outcome.
When the voting machine is a
touch-screen computer such as those used in a recent Fox and Friends
experiment with a cyberballot, There is no paper trail to prove who voted
for which candidate. When you cast your ballot electronically, there is
no way to prove which candidate lost the votes or which gained votes not
actually cast for them. In both cases, with either the AccVote Optical-Scan
machines or the touch-screen computer, the first clue that someone hacked
the voting machines comes from the exit pollsjust as it did in New
Hampshire.
Barack
Obama led 41% to 28% in a USA Today-Gallop poll. CNN gave Obama
a 39% to 30% edge over the New York Senator. Fox News put the race
at 32% to 28% for Obama. Every indicator, including the people
who cast the votes, gave the win to Obama. Yet, when the votes
were counted, Hillary Clinton won 39.4% to 36.8%. When you examine
the Diebold AccVote Optical-Scan voting machine count for the candidates,
Hillary took 52.95% of the votes compared to 47.05% for Obama.
However, when you examine the paper ballots, Obama took 52.93%
of the votes compared to 47.07% for Hillary.
By no stretch of the imagination
can you make the argument that Hillary Clinton honestly won a majority
of the votes cast in all of the voting precincts where machines were used,
and that Obama only won in the districts using paper ballots. Logic
suggests that someone was playing loosey-goosey with the voting machine's
memory bank and credited the Obama hits to Hillary and visa
versa. The
Ron Paul Campaign insists that the paper ballots show that John
McCain's votes were switched with votes for Dr. Paul since
the paper ballots they were allowed to examine in specific precincts were
an exact reverse match with the results computed by the AccVote Optical-Scan
voting machines.
The Congressman's
War Room website shows a Fox & Friends newsclip of an interview
with Ed Felton, a Princeton University professor who infected a
touch-screen voting machine with a string of computer code that retabulated
the the votes cast by taking votes cast for one candidate and giving them
to another one. It can be accessed on http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=1103.
The video shows how easily a hacker, who can write code, can reconfigure
the votes on a particular touch screen computer if they can access the
hard drive of the computer.
Let's stop for a moment and
look at the massive warchests of the media-ordained designated winners
from both sides and ask ourselves why that is a good thing. For us, it's
not. For the American people there are no Democratic candidates that any
intelligent, patriotic American can afford to vote for and only two on
the Republican sidewith neither one of them being designated frontrunner
John McCain. McCain, like his Democratic opponents,
spends most of his time lying about his record in Congress to conceal
the fact that he is every bit as liberal as Senators Barack Obama
and Hillary Clinton. Yet, the media-ordained "designees"Clinton,
McCain and Obamaare touted as the only candidates
who can fix the mess in Washington,. In reality, the "mess"
was caused by that end of Pennsylvania Avenue since those in the House
and Senate are the folks who write the laws demanded as quid pro quos
by the constituents who filled their campaign war chests.
The globalists are now completing
the structure of a new non-government organization [NGO] known as the
Transatlantic Economic Council. An agreement of intent was signed
in a White House ceremony in April, 2007 by President George W. Bush,
German Chancellor Angela Merkel and European Commission
President Jose Manuel Barroso of Portugal.
Charged with the responsibility
of finalizing the surrender of America's economic sovereignty to the European
Union will be a task assigned to the next president. The globalists
who are backing Clinton, Obama and McCainthe
current designated winner and losers of the Election of 2008. The
globalists have pretty much discounted Romney (who is the only
GOP candidate standing who can beat Clinton or Obamaregardless
what the liberal media says) since the media only mentions his name when
they are comparing his status in the polls with frontrunner John McCainprecisely
the same ploy the media used by the media in 1980 when they compared Reagan
with frontrunner George H.W. Bush.
Only time will tell whether
Hillary or Obama is the designated winner although the
Rockefeller-controlled banks: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup
and JPMorgan Chase began funding Obama as well as Hillary
and McCain just before the New Hampshire vote. On top of that,
several of Hillary's most important fundraisers jumped ship and
joined Obamaincluding two of them close enough to the Clintons
to have slept in the Lincoln Bedroom) When you want to know what a candidate
will do if he or she wins the White House, don't listen to their rhetoric
since it is merely political hype. Look at their contributors. Since each
of those donors expect to gain far more than they gave, you can see the
agenda that will come from that White House when you look at the financial
focus of those contributors.
Thus far, (to the best of my knowledge) Obama has
not tapped DLA PiperHillary Clinton's top money source.
Nor has he tapped a couple of very important financial resources Hillary
shares with McCain. DLA Piper is a high technology company
with offices located throughout the Asia, Europe, the United Statesand,
most important, in the Middle East. Blank Rome LLP and Greenberg
Traurig LLP. bankrolled both McCain and Clinton. Blank
Rome, specializes in IRS regulations. They are McCain's primary
money source. Greenberg Traurig specializes in international law.
If Obama continues his South Carolina trend on Super Tuesday, DLA
Piper, Blank Rome and Greenberg-Traurig will be writing checks
with his name on them.
McCain is the designated
loser. And, yes, all three understand their role in the Election of 2008.
But only McCain is resigned to his fate.I guess he's just happy
to play. A viewer of Fox News' The Big Story emailed
host John Gibson on Wednesday, Jan. 30. The emailer commented that
McCain's win in Florida on Tuesday, Jan. 29 was evidence that the
Republicans were going to lose in November. Big
Story co-host Heather Nauert, Gibson's blonde bimbo
sidekick (who apparently is not on the show for her political prowness),
poophahed the comments of the emailer by saying McCain would likely
pull votes from the moderates and independents on election day, suggesting
that added together, the conservative, moderate and independent vote would
put McCain over the top. Sadly, with McCain heading the
GOP ticket, the conservative voter will very likely sit out the election
since a vote for McCain is a vote for liberal government. And,
of course, they won't vote for either Clinton or Obama.
The only votes McCain will get are those from anti-black, anti-feminist
Democrats, and from centrist Republicansproviding they are pro-abortion
businessmen who want an influx of illegal aliens in America and, of course,
who also want their taxes increased.
Which ever of the designated
winner and losers ends up with the prize, America loses. The 44th President
of the United States has already been charged withand has agreed
tothe task of abrogating the economic sovereignty of the United
States. Hemispheric governmentwith the merging of Canada, Mexico
with the United States, followed by the inclusion of Central and then
South America into what will be called the American Union with the absolute
loss of national sovereigntyis just around the corner.
Using
A Constitutional Convention
To Kill The Bill of Rights And
Create the North American Union
To combat this,
citizen groups will push for for a Constitutional Convention during the
111th Congress. Two-thirds, or 34, States must agree. The argument that
will be advanced to sell the American people on the need for a Constitutional
Convention is that it is the only way to thwart the Council on Foreign
Relation's plan to formalize the North American Union. And, with globalist
McCain, Clinton or Obama in the White House, the
argument will appear to contain enough truth that it will draw supporters
like metal shaving to a magnet.
In addition,
proponents of the Convention will argue that only a constitutional amendment
will force the federal government to deport all illegal aliens. Again,
it will sound logical. And, if enough Americans are conned into supporting
the notionjust as thousands of Americans did in 1995 when the Rockefeller
Foundation funded the Council of
State Governments (which was created in 1933) advocated that
the only way to reverse federalism and restore States rights was through
a Constitutional Convention. To make it appear that the Council
of State Governments was a conservative, patriotic group, its
leadership ranks contained the names of prominent Republicans including
then Utah Gov. Michael Leavitt (who is now George W. Bush's
Secretary of Heath and Human Services).
What happened
in 1786 will happen again in 2009. When
they called for a Convention of the States in Annapolis, Maryland
in September, 1786, the fledgling central government in United States
had no authority over the States. When the federal government had to pay
its bills, it had to ask for the money to meet its demands. The States
assessed their citizens the tax dollars the federal government required.
The central government lacked the authority to levy taxesmuch the
same way the United Nations lacked the ability to levy taxes when it was
formally launched as the replacement of the failed League of Nations in
1945. Nor did the federal government have the power to regulate trade
between the States. The delegates at the Convention agreed that the powers
of the federal government needed to be enlarged sufficiently to allow
it to function with at least a semblance of autonomy as their agent before
the nations of the worldwithout the embarrassment of not being able
to act without first saying, "Mother, may I?"
A report on
the Annapolis Convention was submitted to Congress on Sept. 14, 1786,
with a request for another convention that commenced on May 25, 1787 in
Philadelphia. (The Convention was to start on May 14, but a quorum of
delegates did not arrive until the 25th.) The Constitution of the United
Statesthat was supposed to be nothing more than an instrument to
correct the shortfalls in the Articles of Confederationwas hammered
out between May 25 and Sept. 17, 1787. Signing that document radically-altered
the nature of the government of the United States. It curbed the power
of the States by sharing power coequally with the federal government and
the people. Since the ratification of the 17th Amendment which completely
eliminated the States from the equation of power, there has been a fear
that another Constitutional Convention will be used to abolish the Bill
of Rights, replacing it with a new Constitution that clones the European
Union's Convention on Human Rights. And US citizens, without the
protection of the 2nd Amendment, will be obligatedunder force of
arms and threats of imprisonmentto surrender their weapons to the
even more powerful central government.
Once the Bill
of Rightsparticularly the 2nd Amendmentis erased and "legal
firearms" are surrendered, surrendering national sovereignty to the
globalists will be easy because an unarmed people cannot resist tyranny
for very long. One need only look at the history of Nazi Germany, fascist
Italy and the Soviet Union to see the proof of that statement.
Free speech,
an inherent right under the 1st Amendment: "Congress shall make
no law...abridgng the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the rights
of the people peaceably to assemble..." will be replaced with
speech that is not quite as freeand more like the retractable rights
found in Article 10 of the Convention on Human Rights: "Everyone
has the right ...to receive and impart information and ideas without interference
by public authority and regardless of frontiers...The exercise of these
freedoms...since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be
subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as
are prescribed by law and are necessary in any democratic society in he
interests of national security..."
Hopefully, the
American people are smart enough to understand what is at stake in the
Election of 2008. What is at stake is the United States of America as
we know it. If we elect any of the "designated" players, before
that designated winner leaves office on January 20, 2013, what was the
United States of America will very likely be converted into the North
American Union or simply the American Union an American version
of the European Union where all peoples in the western hemisphere may
go where they want, settle where they want, and be accorded all of the
rights and privileges of an American citizen. Except, of course, the right
to own a gun or advocate for a constitutional convention to restore our
former Republic.
The overlords
of business and industry are convinced they have finally won. When it
became obvious that, with 6 to 8 candidates in each political camp, no
one would get enough delegates to walk into their respective national
conventions with the nomination in their pocket, the money barons suggested
to the second and third tier candidates that it was time to get out of
the race. On the Democratic side, all of them did, leaving only the designated
players: Obama and Clinton. On the GOP side, Rudy Giuliani
obediently bowed out, surrendering his delegates to designated loser,
McCain. The race was now shaping up pretty much the way the Money
Mafia planned it.
Second tier candidates Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul would
continue to drain votes from the only serious challenger McCain
hasMitt Romney, guaranteeing that, at least on the Republican
side of the equation, McCain will go to Minneapolis on September
1 with the nomination in his pocket.
Just before
Super Tuesday, McCain had 95 delegates. Romney had 67, Huckabee
had 26 and Dr. Paul had 6. Giulianiwhom the media
labeled the frontrunner for over a yearhad 1 delegate, which
he surrendered to McCain. The magic number is 1,191 delegates out
of a possible 2,360. Based on polls in 5 of the 22 States that will vote
on Super Tuesdayand where the races are easy to guess, McCain
is expected to win 156 delegates, giving him about 25% of what he needs
to be declared the GOP nominee. Romney will pocket 89 delegates
in those 5 states, giving him 148. Huckabee will add 85 delegates
if he succeeds in taking Georgia, where he is currently leading in the
polls. Dr. Paul will add 18 delegates in those 5 States, giving
him 22. Every national poll predicts that designated loser McCain
to win every major delegate prize.
It's clear that
Huckabee and Paul were not encouraged by the Money
Mafia to drop out
of the race, because if they did, and the GOP race suddenly became a two
man raceand they split what was left, neither McCain nor
Romney would have enough delegates to win a first ballot nomination.
What that means is that we would have a brokered convention that would
put all of the original GOP candidates in play, giving the delegates a
chance to nominate a genuine conservative as the GOP standard bearer.
If they worked the floor, Huckabee and Paulas well
as Fred Dalton Thompson, Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo
would have a shot at the nomination. The one man we can be sure would
not get it would be the designated loser, John McCain. Then, finally,
McCainwho is every bit as liberal as Hillary Clinton
and his buddy Ted Kennedymight be honest with the voters
in Arizona and join the Democratic Party where he belongs.
|
|