Behind the Headlines
Video of the Week
Internet Articles (2012)
Internet Articles (2011)
Internet Articles (2010)
Internet Articles (2008)
Internet Articles (2007)
Internet Articles (2006)
Internet Articles (2005)
Internet Articles (2004)
Internet Articles (2003)
Internet Articles (2002)
Internet Articles (2001)
John Q. Public really as stupid as he
looks? Or, are the politicians so shrewd
they can steal your liberty and leave you
thinking you just voted in an honest electionwhich they just stole?
the answer is: both of the above.
28, 2009 I wrote a piece entitled Forgot
the past? Here's the future. It's a piece that every American
who expects to vote in an honest election should have not only read, but
made sure that every friend, family member and distant relative read as
well. About 75 thousand people read it. And, after the initial shock of
what they had read, about 50 thousand of them said, "Someone needs
to do something about this." And then each went back to busying
themselves with whatever it was they were doing before they read that
piece on Jon
Christian Ryter's Conservative World.
name is even more appropriate today than it was when I wrote it three
years ago. Sadly, in three short years we, as a nation, have conveniently
forgotten the past. We seem to view vote theft not as a criminal actjust
crooked politics. In 2008, Barack Obamaa man, by all appearances,
who is not eligible to run for State or national political office in the
United Statesstole the Office of the Presidency in 2008 with the
help of ACORN, MoveOn.org and Bill Clinton's National Voter
Registration Act of 1993 (the Motor Voter Act) which was legislated
by a Democratic majority in both the House and Senate during the first
year of Clinton's presidency to make it easier for minorities and
illegals to vote in national elections.
to hear the Democrats talk, the purpose of the Motor Voter Act
was to protect minorities from the bad Republicans who, they have steadfastly
insisted since 1993, want to keep minorities as second class citizens
by preventing them from voting. In reality what every good citizen in
the United Statesnot just elected Republicanswants to do is
make sure what happened in 2008 and again in 2012, never happens again.
Ferreting out and prosecuting scores of socialist union officials and
weak-knee union members, social progressive political activists and thousands
of "give me free stuff" idiots.
me free stuff" crowd who actually believed that when the election
dust settled, they would get all those freebies promised them by the leftwing
political activists are in for a shock. Before pining away on dreams of
living the good life on someone else's dime, they need to take a minute
and stop any of the 46% still-unemployed blacks (who never got any of
that free stuff in 2009 except food stamps) and ask them if they're
better off today than they were before they took the bait on the end of
the Obama lie that if they helped him win the White House, he would
In 2002 vote
theft was suddenly becoming easier and a lot more high tech than it was
during the Florida chad dance. The media sold the public a bill of goods.
The left convinced very gullible voters that election fraud happens in
voting systems where voters must either mark a ballot or, using a stylus,
punch out a chad to indicate their choice. Because of the chad dance
in 2000, the GOP-controlled Congress passed the Help America Vote
Act of 2002 [HAVA] (Public Law 107-252)which actually made vote
theft much easier. And, President George W. Bush, who failed to
see the "Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin" handwriting on
the wall, signed the measure into law, helping the social progressives
get rid of voting systems which left indelible fingerprints of the voter
on the ballot.
high tech electronic voting machines leave no fingerprints of how the
voter actually intended to voteand no fingerprints of the cyberthief
who rigged the machine to cast 99% of the votes for a "default"
candidate. A provision
in HAVA required the Statesall of themto obligate
voters to show a valid form of identification which contained a current
photograph of them to prove they are eligible to vote.
a right of liberty that comes with the responsibility of protecting that
right for every voter against crooked politicians. It's not a right to
be used by illegal aliens living in the shadows of America to protect
their imaginary right to be here by creating sanctuary cities in violation
of the Federal
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (Public Law 82-414, 66
Stat), enacted over President Harry Truman's veto on June 27, 1952.
By the way, Public Law 82-414 was created, written and enacted by the
Democratically-controlled 82nd Congress. The law is so tough not only
on illegals, but on the "good citizens" who help them, and the
local "officials" who protect them. Anyone who feeds an illegal
alien, transports them or provides them shelter is subject to a $10,000
fine (per infraction) and/or up to 5 years in a federal penitentiary.
The 82nd Congress
was very serious about solving the problem of America's porous borders.
It's important for the People of the United States and their government
to understand that illegal aliens are not protected by the Bill of Rights.
The Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights apply to
the United States and its lawful citizensbut not our neighbors.
The Constitution was written to protects America's legal citizens. So
was the Bill of Rights. It's not a blanket amnesty for those who sneak
into our country in the dead of night.
No place in
the Federalist Papers did Alexander Hamilton, James Monroe,
or John Jay suggest the American Constitution was a universal document
that protects our friendsand enemies. Illegal aliens and citizens
of the other 190 nations on Earth are protected by the UN International
Covenant on Civil & Political Rights since they are citizens of
other lands. By the way, if you and I crossed into Mexico in the dead
of night and somehow managed to vote in a Mexican national election, we
would be sitting in a Mexican prison for about ten years. Why should illegals
in this country fare any different?
To make sure
that those voting the Daley Dead (or, in 2012, union workers, and
the "give me free stuff" crowd), who fraudulently early-voted
registered Republican voters in Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Colorado
and Florida (who always vote on Election Day) with impunity, liberal federal
judges ruled in lawsuits filed by Obama Administration Attorney
General Eric Holder, MoveOn.org, the ACLU and other leftwing
community activist groups, that requiring verification of the identity
of those seeking to vote in a presidential election was a form of racism,
opening the door wide for the fraudulent voting the Democrats needed to
win the election.
voting has existed in Florida since the State enacted the Florida Electronic
Voting Systems Act of 1976, the first State to use e.voting was Illinoisthe
State which originated voting the dead. The year was 1975. The machine,
the very first direct recording electronic voting machine [DRE], called
Video Voter, was used to record and count the ballots. The first
two Illinois cities to use electronic voting machines were Streamwood
and Woodstock. Streamwood is a suburb of Chicago. Woodstock is 51 miles
north of Chicago in adjacent McHenry County.
State in the Union uses some form of electronic voting except New York.
While no State universally uses paper ballots, there are voting precincts
in several States which still do. Only paper ballots and punch cards actually
leave the fingerprint of the voter on the ballot which allows voting officials
to conduct an accurately recount if the contest is challenged. The exception
to that statement was the Florida Chad Dance in 2000 which was
choreographed by the Gore Campaign whose election hinged on winning
a State he had already lost in the voting booth, and whose campaign continually
changed the rules of what constituted a Gore vote.
In 1973 America
began to experience something newa voting system specifically created
to aid vote fraud as it erased the evidence of the crime. On Jan. 23,
1973 Congress voted itself an electronic voting system. Because the Democratically-controlled
Congress felt that electronic voting was good to count 438 votes in the
House and 100 votes in the Senate, they reasoned it would be good enough
to electronically tabulate the votes in America's national elections.
The attempt failed
because the Constitution of the United States places control of the manner
in which ballots are cast in the States to the States.
be as close as Congress could getbut it was close enough. With the
princes of industry and the barons of banking and business prepared to
dole out enough "campaign" largess to State legislators and
governors to change how votes are cast and elections are wonand
the how the candidates the money barons needed steering the engine of
State (that the people don't trust) somehow continue to get elected with
only 30% to 40% of the voters voting for them. We have Senators and Congressmen
who accomplish that every election. And, I suspect the guy in the White
House has now done it twice.
In point of
fact, as the elections of 2008 and 2012 verify, when you control what
goes in and comes out of the ballot box, you can't lose the election.
For example, in 2008, 96,992,000 registered voters who actually voted
somehow cast 132,618,580 ballots. Not to be much outdone by 2008,
in 2012, 90,682,968 registered voters somehow delivered 126,985,809
The 2012 numbers
will forever remain unclear because, according to thousands of reports
from registered Republican voters in the battleground States of Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Michigan, North Carolina, and Coloradowho always
vote on Election Daywhen they showed up at their local voting precinct
on Nov. 6, 2012 to cast their ballots for Mitt Romney, they discovered
their names had voted early, and its a safe bet that the invisible
surrogates who stole their vote cast their ballots for Obama. The
Democrats learned a whole new meaningand usefor the term "data-mining"
to fix thisof the Supreme Court does. Here is the reality. Article
II, Section 1, paragraph 5 of the US Constitution mandates that as far
as voting for President of the United States, that votingall of
itmust constitutionally happen on one day. And that day will
necessarily be the same day throughout the entire United States. The
Constitution mandates ONE DAY when the people vote for the person they
wish to lead the nation. That day will be the first Tuesday after
the first Monday in November every four years. Period. Pay attention,
people! Congress has no authority to enact any laws to provide early voting
without first amending the Constitution of the United States. Congress
does possess the right to change the date of the national election, but
the Constitution mandates that all ballots by all people must be cast
on the same day. The politicians who need to steal power to have power
need stealth to win. When they are forced to act in the light of day with
the nation watching, they become a little more honest.
Why do conservative
talking heads indulge the liberal media with polite, weak-knee politically-correct
rhetoric? Rhetoric which pretends that Democratic labor unions, MoveOn.org,
ACORN (under whatever name they are using this year) and thousands of
"give me free stuff" deadbeats who think someone else
is supposed to provide them a living after Mom and Dad booted their lazy,
sorry butts out, won by legal gamesmanship? When the left manages to
produce 35,626,580 more votes than voters in 2008 and 36,292.841 more
votes than voters in 2012 and what appears (by sheet guesswork), to
be about 6.3 million votes stolen from registered GOP voters whose votes
were pirated from them when the left data-mined GOP voting patterns to
which they should never have had access.
What the conservative
talking heads, and the print and electronic journalists should have been
shouting from the rooftops on Nov. 7 is that the Election of 2012 was
as bad as the worst third world crooked election not because they manufactured
666,261 more fraudulent votes from nonexistent voters than they did in
2008, but because the left stole what appears to be over 6 million votes
from active GOP voters by early-voting the names of Republicans who traditionally
cast their votes on Election Day, denying those voters the right to vote.
Where is the protest on that one from the left? Muffled by the laughter,
In the State
of Colorado, which was polling heavily for Romney, 10 counties
experienced voter turnout of from a 104% to 120% in an election where
the national voter turnout was 57.7%. Keep in mine, its factually impossible
to have voter turnout over 100% since the voter pool is mathematically
limited to a maximum of 100%. On top of that, it's virtually impossible
to have 100% voter turnout. That happens open only in a country where
people are marched from their homes at the point of a gun to votefor
the only person on the ballot. The dictator.
there were 59 voting precincts in which Gov. Mitt Romney appeared
not to have received a single vote. Which, again, is so unlikely it's
virtually impossible. Obama, however, got 19,105 votes. Obama
voters turned out at a rate of 108%. Once again, impossible.
appeared to have the same problem in the 100 voting precincts in Cuyahoga
County, Ohio (Cleveland). Romney received zero votes; Obama
received 99% of the votes. The problem in Cleveland was repeated throughout
Pennsylvaniathe State that Obama media pundits said Obama
wasn't worried about losing. Now I see whya large number of voting
machines were set on "default." Obama was the default
candidate. Fox News reported that this problem was not unique to
Pennsylvania. Hundreds, if not thousands, of voters not only in Pennsylvania,
but in Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio and Texas were reporting the same
thing. Fox News also reported that two election judges were replaced
in one Ohio precinct for allowing unregistered voters to cast ballots.
County, NC the voting machines all defaulted to Obama in 2012.
One woman complained to Fox News said it took her three tries before
she was able to vote for Romney. When Fox News called the
Guilford County Election Chairman, the official dismissed the problem
saying it's "...related to the machine not being calibrated correctly,"
adding that "...it's an easy problem to fix." Oh,
really? Guilford County had the same problem in 2008an almost
universal default problem favoring Obama then, too. Four years
later, and the problem still exists. Or, is the only problem that people
complained about it to the media in 2012?
Examiner reporter Byron York observed another anomaly in Ohio.
There were 200 thousand fewer white voters voting in Ohio in 2012
than in 2008. "There were several theories about those missing
white voters, but the most plausible is that those who were undecided
or weak were influenced by Obama's attacks on Romney."
It appears in a few voting precincts, the votes but not the voting
recordsthe indelible fingerprint of the votersimply vanished.
In Florida, the Sun Sentinel reported that a week after the election,
county workers found 963 voted but never counted ballots that were stored
in a warehouse. Brenda Snipes, the Election Supervisor shrugged
it off saying, "It's routine for vote totals to be adjusted up
until the final certification date of Nov. 18." I expect, though,
that only applies to Democratic votes.
newspaper Pravda, which was apparently watching the US election
a lot closer than the Columbus Dispatch or the Cincinnati Enquirer,
reported that in one Ohio county Obama received 106,258 votes from
the county's 98,213 registered voters. Two things happened here. First,
the voting machines were set on an Obama "default" setting
(which means he gets 100% of the votes regardless who you voted for);
and second, very likely 8,045 absentee ballot registrations in that county
were deemed to be fraudulent and tossed. The absentee ballots, which are
immediately "blue-bagged" when the community activist-generated
voter registrations are turned in to the County Election Board. When the
registration is found to be fake, it's too late to discard the fraudulent
vote that accompanied it since, technically, it's already in the ballot
you would have thought the Democrats would view as a safe haven for ObamaSteve
Picknum, a Cook County equipment manager for the election system,
said he was called whenever a voting machine malfunctioned. Everytime
he was called, he could see the voting preference of the voterRomney.
Whenever the voter cast his or her ballot for Romney, a "voter
save failure" message appeared on the screen. At no time did
an Obama voter have a "voter error" message. When Picknum
went to votefor Romneyhe got the same error message
to voter rights in 2008 and again in 2012 was not "just politics
as usual" It is felony theft. But, it was more than that. Political
parties, financed by the princes of industry and the barons of banking
and business committed treason against the People of the United States
of America. While most people think of treason as aiding and abetting
a foreign government in the overthrow the nation, it's more than that.
On a slightly lesser scale, the theft of an election is, or can be, the
overthrowing of the form of government the majority of the People voted
to restore or maintain. And it is treason.
the People" intend to restore a free and honest government, we need
to get rid of the crooked politicians whose seats are secured by rigged
ballot boxes and the largess of wealthy fat cats who enrich themselves
by buying access to the legislation they need. As Americans, we need to
start telling ourselves the whole truth about how corrupt our government
is. And, even more important, when all of the local, regional and national
election data and exit polling tell us that "Candidate A" will
beat "Candidate B," and when the best political strategists
in the country are telling the numbers-crunchers there's something wrong
with their numbersyou can bet there is. Particularly when the left
produces 35,626,580 more votes than voters in 2008, and 36,292,841 more
votes than voters in 2012, you simply don't ignore it because you can't
explain it. What it means is that someone is stealing the election.
You don't play "good sport" and concede. You initiate a constitutional
crisis because that's what stealing an election isa constitutional
crisis. And, when 200,000 white voter votes in Ohio simply vanish
it isn't a "puzzle." It's a constitutional crisis. Let's put
this wordy article in simple terms that Samuel Adams and John
Hancock would easily understand. Someone's trying to steal the
you do when you are invaded by scallywags and scoundrels? You pay attention
to what the Supreme Court said on May 13, 1939 in the case of United
States v Miller (307 US 174 ) when they found Franklin D. Roosevelt's
National Firearms Act of 1934 unconstitutional. In their decision,
the Supreme Court made it clear that the purpose of the 2nd Amendment
was not to restrict the rights of people to own firearms, but to protect
the people from their government.
further said that it was the inherent belief of the Founding Fathers that
the people might someday have to fight an oppressive government and, therefore,
it was in the best interests of the nation that the people be as well-armed
as its government. From the brazen openness of the theft of power
in 2008 and 2012, and the media ignoring what is visible to the naked
eye, the fear of the Hughes Court in 1939 was that someday soon the American
people might have to retake their Republic by force may be coming to past.
By the way, the decision in United States v Miller was 8-to-0,
with Associate Justice William O. Douglas abstaining. Voting to kill FDR's
antigun law was Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes and Associate Justices
Felix Frankfurter, Hugo Black, James McReynolds, Pierce Butler, Harlan
Stone, Owen Roberts, and Stanley Reed. Even liberal justices, when they
see a tyrant living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, will vote for liberty.
for whatever it's worth, once again, you have my two cents worth on this
subject. Until next time...