oday's droughts are caused by a six decade old invisible white elephant initially created by the scientific brain trust in the Truman Administration through the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration [NOAA], beginning with drought research in 1946. In 1951 the National Aeronautical Space Agency [NASA], which was not franchised to investigate climate research on Earth, but could analyze climate change on the inner planets in our solar system, quickly discovered that climate change—both warming and cooling—was not caused by carbon dioxide emissions. Global warming—and cooling—is caused by the presence or absence of sunspots and solar flares on our sun. Once NASA discovered the truth 64 years before former Vice President Al Gore, Jr. declared the debate on whether or not global warming was caused by man was over, the debate was over simply because the CIA told NASA the debate was over. Why?

On Jan. 4, 2002, Dr. Michael Chossudovskya, Professor of Economics at the University of Ottowa wrote a piece for Global Research in which he said: "Environmental modification techniques for military use constitute, in the present context of global warfare, the ultimate weapon of mass destruction. Rarely acknowledged in the debate on global climate change, the world's weather can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated electromagnetic weapons. Both the US and Russia have developed capabilities to manipulate the climate for military use."

Chossudovskya further noted that "...despite a vast body of scientific knowledge [which suggested the contrary], the issue of deliberate climatic manipulations for military use has never been explicitly part of the UN agenda on climate change." World renown scientist scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell insisted that US military scientists were working on weather systems as a potential military weapon. The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth's atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods."

Nicholas Begich, one of the activists who exposed HAARP described it as a powerful radio wave beam that actually lifts a slice of the ionosphere with an electronic beam and heats-up the targeted area, then bounces it back to Earth. HAARP (the US government's high-frequency active auroral research program is based in Gomoka, Alaska. It was created by the US Air Force and the US Navy under the under the orders of President Ronald Reagan's US Strategic Defense Initiative [SDI] on March 23, 1983. HAARP was a sophisticated new generation of weapons based on the technology of Nikola Tesla who discovered that useful energy could be extracted from the heat of ambient air, and that electric power in the form of radiant energy could be broadcast to everyone in the world through the ground. HAARP appears to work the same way—by gathering and redirecting the heat which solar energy stores in the ambient air. Telsa's technology allows military submarines to communicate from the floors of the deepest oceans, ignoring the curvature of the Earth.

While it appears the military is still covertly working on Star Wars weaponry using Tesla's technology, HAARP doesn't appear to have the capability yet to destroy cities or evaporate carbon-based targets (i.e., people). But make no mistake about it, inside HAARP's Pandora's Box is a virtual candy store containing a cornucopia of deadly military sweets that you can bet someone is trying to convert into the world's newest most terrifying weapon. And, like most of man's deadly toys, too much of the wrong ingredients could end live as we know it on planet Earth.

Throughout human history in America until the dust bowl waste lands of the Great Depression and beyond, droughts haven't been caused by climate scientists trying to divert torrential rains from flood swollen lakes and rivers to drought-famished farmlands, droughts were blamed on the farmers and the bankers who taught them greed. Remember the Dust Bowl from Oklahoma to the Great Plains? Droughts from the mid- to late 19th century and the early 20th century were all blamed on farmers who were urged to over-plant their fields. They didn't know they could "over-farm" their land and destroy the topsoil.

In the late 1930s and 1940s the USDA began to teach farmers how to use cover crops to protect their topsoil for their primary foot crops: wheat, barley, rice and corn. Cover crops improved soil health by increasing soil organic matter, diminishing erosion, and by improving both oxygen levels and water through the soil, and by reducing soil compacting by recycling the nutrients in the soil and protecting soil moisture. An Illinois farmer, Dan Steidinger used radishes, which have deep roots, as a cover crop to increase water infiltration in his corn fields. The radish roots pulled water much deeper into the earth. A Minnesota wheat farmer, Kevin Harms and his brother Dan used rye grass as a cover crop. They discovered they averaged 100 bushels more per acre.by planting rye grass which has roots that grow up to 40 inches and aerates the ground much deeper than most cover crops. Sadly, most farmers in the 1930s never graduated from agricultural schools. They were farmers because their fathers were farmers who learned farming from their fathers.

The Dust Bowl hit in 1934-1936 and 1938-40 in the panhandle of Texas and all of Oklahoma, New Mexico, Colorado and much of Kansas. It was the driest, most widespread drought in over 1,000 years. The High Plains area of the Great Plains has a drought path which runs west from the 100th meridian to the Rocky Mountains. The elevation of the High Plains is from 2,500 to 6,000 feet. Some areas receive barely any rain per year. Some areas in the high plains receive less than 20 inches of precipitation per year. Only short grass grows. There are unusual wet periods alternating with the drought years in the high plains. At the end of the Civil War, the High Plains were experiencing a wet period leading emigrants from Europe to believe they could become rich farming in the American high plains. Drought always followed the rain. Historically, while the plow followed the rain, bankruptcy follows the drought.

At the end of World War I, with most of the farmland in Europe destroyed by war, American ranchers and farmers in the Great Plains—living in a 150,000 square miles oasis of the most fertile farmland in the world with topsoil from 4" to 6" deep at a time when the only thing 6" deep or deeper in Europe were bomb craters—were encouraged to either buy or lease more land in order to double or triple their crop output; and finally, to modernize that yield by buying tractors, plows, seeders and whatever else they needed, financed by State banks under the Farm Credit Loan Act of 1916 which formed the Federal Farm Credit Administration in 1918 to greatly increase the mechanization of food production for both American and European consumers by arranging loans to modernize farms which had been using plows pulled by a team of mules or horses.

With the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and with farm commodity prices dropping as fast as the stock market farmers, like stock brokers, were losing their proverbial shirts. With the farmers going bankrupt at a faster pace than bankers and stock brokers, in 1923 the Farm Credit Loan Act of 1916 was amended with the Agricultural Credits Act in order to provide farmers with credit extensions in order to keep them solvent until the banks could profit more from taking their farms. The farmers were faced with the dilemma of having to borrow more money than they could ever afford to repay to keep the banks from taking their farms—which most of the banks didn't want.

Weaponizing the climate was initially funded by Lyndon Johnson through the CIA to the tune of $6.8 million (with the money being laundered by NASA). Richard Nixon speeded up the weaponization of weather in 1970 to the tune of $248.5 million by including NOAA as a recipient and "paymaster" of CIA funds.

Leftwing environmentals, State legislators and US Congressmen and Senators began to divert water from the primary water sources in the Western United States like the Animas and Colorado Rivers and the San Joaquin River in California because the agri-giants from San Diego to Sacramento produce 60%—or more, in some cases—of the fruits and vegetables consumed in the United States. This is the war the Obama Dept. of Agriculture and Obama's EPA are waging against small, independent ranchers and farm producers by using the water from agri-feeder rivers like the Colorado whose water the southwestern States need to irrigate their crops.

In the American southwest severe water shortages are now in their fifth year. Add to that droughts that are converting some of what used to be the richest farmland in the western United States into dry wasteland. In the northern United States, Executive Orders issued by Barack Obama allow a handful of major Democratic donors to use a legal loophole to sell Great Lakes fresh water to China. The US Army Corps of Engineers reported in 2013 that Lake Huron and Lake Michigan have reached their lowest levels since record-keeping began in 1918.

The Obama loophole was created in a Treaty signed in 2008 to prevent U S companies from selling essential natural resources—like water—to our political enemies and economic competitors. The treaty is the Great Lakes Compact, an agreement signed by the eight Great Lakes States, Canada and the two Canadian provinces, Ontario and Quebec. Its terms cannot be changed without the approval of all Compact member States, Canadian provinces and the Canadian Parliament.. (Less formal and less binding Great Lakes water agreements existed before the compact.)

In 1998, a plan was devised by Canadian entrepreneur, John Febbraro's Nova Group, which proposed exporting about 156 million gallons of Lake Superior water per year to Asia via tanker ships. The Ontario Ministry of the Environment approved the proposal before news of it spread to outraged Great Lakes residents and lawmakers on both sides of the border. "It was a silly idea, but it raised enough concerns," said Ralph Pentland, chairman of the Canadian Water Issues Council at the University of Toronto. Pentland co-chaired the International Joint Commission, a U.S. and Canadian agency that works to protect boundary waters and resolve disputes over them, at the time the Great Lakes Compact was approved in 2008. Pentland said that "...shipping water from Lake Superior would be entirely impractical. It could never happen. But it made people think they should start preparing for these kinds of eventualities—even if it didn't make economic sense then."

The Compact differentiated products that contain water—beer brewed in Milwaukee. or soft drinks from "spring water" bottled in Michigan or bulk water shipped in tankers. Or a head of lettuce grown on a Midwestern farm with water from aquaducts from Lake Superior or one of the other Great Lakes. The compact included a controversial exemption which allowed for water removal from the basin in containers of 5.8 gallons or less, often called the "bottled water exemption." A 2000 report by the International Joint Commission (before the 2008 Compact was signed into international law) noted that the Great Lakes basin imports 14 times the amount of bottled water that is withdrawn from the Great Lakes for shipping elsewhere.

The bottled water issue came to a head in 2002, when Nestle Waters of North America began operating its Ice Mountain Bottled Water plant west of Mt. Pleasant. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality approved Nestle's plan to pump up to 400 gallons of groundwater per minute.

A grassroots group, Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation, sued Nestle and won in circuit court. But the Michigan Court of Appeals stayed the lower court ruling in 2003. The Citizens group and Nestle reached a settlement roughly halving the plant's allowed groundwater extraction to 218 gallons of water per minute.

There is no Obama Executive Order on Earth that can override the 2008 Great Lakes Compact since the Compact is an international treaty which requires all of the signatory nations to amend it. Obama has no authority to waive its provisions. Since the Compact is a legal treaty, Canada would have to be a party to the deal before any Great Lakes water headed anywhere, said Frank Bevacqua, spokesman for the International Joint Commission.

Among the "competitors" vying for Great Lakes water was China and the Muslim nations in the Mideast where water is worth more than oil. From Pakistan to China to Canada, Barack Obama's donors found a leftwing government willing to put the United States in jeopardy anytime there's a drought condition anywhere in the world. Obama signed Executive Order 13547, Obama's Ocean Policy Initiative. Under the Obama Administration's definition, water was no longer an essential natural resource, it's simply a commodity like soybeans and roofing nails which the Obama Administration apparently believes his donor friends can sell for profit.

Aside from Obama himself (who thinks he can waive any law with his fairy godmother wand), the biggest offender in that deal was Nestle, who made an agreement with China to supply them with millions of gallons of fresh water from the Lake Superior—from which Nestle was profiting from $500 thousand to $1.8 million per day. Since the Obama Executive Order violated the Bush-43 Great Lakes Compact, Canada, who was losing as much of its "essential resources" as the United States, filed suit against Nestle in US federal court, and won. Nestle's argument was that water is not a "human right," and for that reason Canada had no legal right to seek an injunction against Nestle for selling a commodity that is anyone's for the taking, arguing that any corporation had the right to privatize natural resources which collectively belong to all of the people and is not a commodity owned by any one individual. Not a single American company joined Canada in its lawsuit against the Obama Administration even though Obama broke an international treaty for personal gain which, ultimately, would have robbed the United States of well over half of all of its fresh drinking water. After stopping Nestle from raiding the Great Lakes and selling an essential commodity it did not own to China, Canada cut a deal with the Obama Administration that would let Canada sell Lake Superior water to the State of California. Canada was also trying to pick up the pieces of Nestle's deal and sell millions of gallons of Great Lakes water from Lakes Huron and Ontario, to China. (That deal did not go through because it required the consent of all of the Great Lakes States and Canada.)

At the end of World War I, with most of the farmland in Europe destroyed by war, American ranchers and farmers in the Great Plains—living in a 150,000 square miles oasis of the most fertile farmland in the world with topsoil from 4" to 6" deep at a time when the only thing 6" deep or deeper in Europe were bomb craters—were encouraged to either buy or lease more land in order to double or triple their crop yield; and finally, to modernize the output of their farms by buying tractors, plows, seeders and whatever else they needed to feed America and her allies, financed under the Farm Credit Loan Act of 1916 which formed the Federal Farm Credit Administration in 1918 to rapidly increase the mechanization of food production to benefit both American and European consumers.

With the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and with farm commodity prices dropping as fast as the stock market, farmers like stock brokers were losing their proverbial shirts. With the farmers going bankrupt at a faster pace than bankers and stock brokers, in 1923 the Farm Credit Loan Act of 1916 was amended with the Agricultural Credits Act in order to provide farmers with credit extensions in order to keep them solvent until the banks could profit more from taking their farms. The farmers were faced with the dilemma of having to borrow more money than they could ever afford to repay to keep the banks from taking farms the banks didn't want.

Because of the leftwing environmentals who divert water from the primary water sources like the Colorado River and the San Joaquin River in California for no other reason than to prevent small, independent ranchers and carnivorousness from using those and other rivers to irrigate their crops. In the American southwest water shortages are now in their fifth year. Add to that droughts that converted some of what used to be the richest farmland in the western United States into dry wasteland. In the northern United States, Executive orders issued by Barack Obama allow a handful of major Democratic donors to use a legal loophole to sell Great Lakes fresh water to China. The US Army Corps of Engineers reported in 2013 that Lake Huron and Lake Michigan have reached their lowest levels since record-keeping began in 1918.

The Obama loophole was created in legislation signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2008 to prevent U S companies from selling essential natural resources—like water—to our political enemies and economic competitors. The lakes' main source of legal protection comes from the Great Lakes Compact, an agreement signed between the eight Great Lakes States, Canada and the two Canadian provinces, Ontario and Quebec. The terms of the Compact, a Treaty between the United States and Canada, was approved by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush. The compact also includes Canada's two provinces on the lakes, Ontario and Quebec, Its terms cannot be changed without the approval of all Compact member States, Canadian provinces and the Canadian Parliament.. (Less formal Great Lakes water agreements existed before the compact. In 1998, a plan was devised plan by a Canadian entrepreneur, John Febbraro's Nova Group, proposed exporting about 156 million gallons of Lake Superior water per year to Asia via tanker ships.

The Ontario Ministry of the Environment approved the proposal before news of it spread to outraged Great Lakes residents and lawmakers on both sides of the border. "It was a silly idea, but it raised enough concerns," said Ralph Pentland, chairman of the Canadian Water Issues Council at the University of Toronto. Pentland co-chaired the International Joint Commission, a U.S. and Canadian agency that works to protect boundary waters and resolve disputes over them, at the time the Great Lakes Compact was devised in 2008. Pentland said that "...shipping water from Lake Superior would be entirely impractical. It could never happen. But it made people think they should start preparing for these kinds of eventualities—even if it didn't make economic sense then."

The compact differentiates products that contain water—beer brewed in Milwaukee. or soft drinks or water bottled in Michigan. Or a head of lettuce grown on a Midwestern farm with water from aquaducts from Lake Superior. The compact included a controversial exemption which allowed for water removal from the basin in containers of 5.8 gallons or less, often called the "bottled water exemption." A 2000 report by the International Joint Commission (before the 2008 Compact was signed into international law) noted that the Great Lakes basin imports 14 times the amount of bottled water that is withdrawn from the Great Lakes for shipping elsewhere.

The bottled water issue came to a head in 2002, when Nestle Waters North America began operating its Ice Mountain Bottled Water plant west of Mt. Pleasant. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality approved Nestle's plan to pump up to 400 gallons of groundwater per minute.

A grassroots group, Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation, sued Nestle and won in circuit court. But the Michigan Court of Appeals stayed the lower court ruling in 2003. The Citizens group and Nestle reached a settlement roughly halving the plant's allowed groundwater extraction at 218 gallons of water per minute.

Since Obama lacks the power to vacate or amend any treaty enaced by Congress and signed into law by a prior President, and be enacted by the political leadership of Canada, Congress, the Canadian parliament and the Prime Minister of Canada would have a say before water headed anywhere, said Frank Bevacqua, spokesman for the International Joint Commission.

Among those "competitors," was China and the Muslim nations in the Mideast where water is worth more than oil. From Pakistan to China to Canada, Barack Obama's donors found a leftwing government willing to put the United States in jeopardy anytime there was a drought condition anywhere in the world. Obama signed Executive Order 13547, Obama's Ocean Policy Initiative. Under the Obama Administration's definition, water was no longer an essential natural resource, it was simply a commodity like soybeans and roofing nails.

Aside from Obama himself (who thinks he can waive any law with his fairy godmother wand), the biggest offender in that deal was Nestle, who made an agreement with China to supply them with millions of gallons of fresh water from the Lake Superior—from which Nestle was profiting from $500 thousand to $1.8 million per day. Since the Obama Executive Order violated the Bush-43 Great Lakes Compact, Canada, who was losing as much of its "essential resources" as the United States, filed suit against Nestle in US federal court, and won. Nestle's argument was that water is not a "human right," and for that reason Canada had no legal right to seek an injunction against Nestle for selling a commodity that is anyone's for the taking, arguing that any corporation had the right to privatize natural resources which collectively belong to all of the people and is not a commodity owned by anyone. Not a single American company joined Canada in its lawsuit against the Obama Administration even though Obama broke an international treaty for personal reasons which, ultimately, would have robbed the United States of well over half of all of its fresh drinking water.

Yet, in the end, after stopping Nestle from raiding the Great Lakes and selling an essential commodity it does not own to China. Canada cut a deal with the Obama Administration that would let Canada sell Lake Superior water to the State of California, Canada is also trying to pick up the pieces of Nestle's deal and sell millions of gallons of Great Lake3s water from Lakes Huron and Ontario, to China. (That deal has not gone through because it requires the consent of all of the Great Lakes States and Canada.)

You've now looked at two of the puzzle pieces . Most people seldom, if ever, see all of them together because no one ever thinks these events are related. That's why they seldom get mad. You can't get mad at Mother Nature. There's a drought. Crops dry up and the top soil blows away. Remember the Dust Bowl from Oklahoma to the Great Plains? The Dust Bowl hit in 1934-1936, 1938-40 in panhandle of Texas and all of Oklahoma, New Mexico, Colorado and much of Kansas. The High Plains area of the Great Plains has a drought path which runs west from the 100th meridian to the Rocky Mountains. The elevation of the High Plains is from 2,500 to 6,000 feet. Some areas receive barely any rain per year at all. Some areas in the high plains receive less than 20 inches of precipitation per year. Only short grass grows. But there are also unusual wet periods alternating with the drought years in the high plains. At the end of the Civil War, the High Plains were experiencing a wet period which led emigrants from Europe to believe they could become rich farming in the American high plains. But, moderate to very severe droughts always followed the rain. Historically, while the plow followed the rain, bankruptcy followed the droughts.

At the end of World War I, with most of the farmland in Europe destroyed by war, American ranchers and farmers in the Great Plains—living in a 150,000 square miles oasis of the most fertile farmland in the world with top soil from 4" to 6' deep at a time when the only thing deeper than 6' in Europe's farmland were bomb craters—were encouraged to buy or lease more land in order to double or triple their crop output. Once they bought the additional land they were encouraged, to modernize their farms by buying tractors, plows, seeders and whatever else they needed, financed by State banks under the Farm Credit Loan Act of 1916 which formed the Federal Farm Credit Administration in 1918 to greatly increase the mechanization of food production for both American and European consumers. For a few minutes, the farmer actually believed the adage, "I'm from the government; and, I'm here to help you."

With the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and with farm commodity prices dropping as fast as the stock market, farmers like stock brokers were losing their proverbial shirts. With the farmers going bankrupt faster than bankers and stock brokers, in 1923 the Farm Credit Loan Act of 1916 was amended with the Agricultural Credits Act in order to provide farmers with credit extensions to keep them solvent until the banks could profit from repossessing their farms. The farmers were faced with the dilemma of having to borrow more money than they could ever afford to repay to keep the banks from taking farms that the banks didn't want. The farms were worth more to the banks as assets even if they were delinquent, than as repossessions that were worth only a fraction of what was owed on them.

If you draw a comparison between the 1930-1943 Depression Era Dust Bowl, the Dirt Bowl of 2010-15, and the 15 year drain-off of Lake Mead, Nevada, you'll discover the people least responsible for the Dust Bowl in 1934-1943, the Dirty Bowl 2000-2015 and during 11 of the last 14-years drought, ranging from moderate to severe, in the Southwest combined with the nations' agri-giants who have been allowed to divert millions of gallons of Colorado River water In Lake Mead to irrigate their corporate farming conglomerates in Colorado, New Mexico and Utah as well as California, Nevada and Arizona. From the building of the Hoover Dam in 1935 which created Lake Mead, America's largest reservoir that stored water from the Upper Basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming to the Coolidge Dam and Glen Canyon Hydroelectric Dam which stored water from the Lower Basin, prevented flooding below the Hoover Dam. The US Bureau of Reclamation created the enormous reservoirs during the wettest part of the current millennium. Tree-ring data suggests the Colorado River Basin will be much drier in the 21st century than in the 20th, with the median projection showing 45% less runoff into the Colorado River.

The Bureau of Reclamation reported that the runoff from the snow in the Rockies in the winter of 2014-15 was at 96% of historic norms. Because of the 2010-11 drought in the Colorado Basin, Lake Powell had risen to only about half its normal summer level. Lake Mead was even worse. In 2011, Lake Mead dropped to 39% of capacity. In August, the Bureau released an additional 2.5 trillion gallons of water from Lake Powell into Lake Mead, lowering the water level in Lake Powell by some three feet

Since 2008, John Entsminger, the senior deputy general manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority—who understands, a little bit better than you and me why the Colorado River Basin is sucking up water like a dry sponge—knows why, very shortly, that Lake Mead water will likely be rationed to States in the Lower Basin. If Lake Mead, which is 1,000 feet above sea level, drops below 1,000 feet, "...we will lose the capacity," Entsminger said, "to serve the municipal needs of 7-in-10 in the State of Nevada (speaking of Clark County (Las Vegas)," which relies exclusively on Lake Mead for its drinking water. Entsminger's Water Authority has been drilling a $900 million third tunnel under Lake Mead. The first two tunnels, covertly initiated over 7 years ago, are now too high since the water level has fallen below the depth of the water in Lake Mead when the first of those two tunnels were drilled almost a decade ago. In early 2015, the third water tunnel from Lake Mead was started. When water levels in Lake Mead fall below 1,025 feet, serious water rationing in Clark County, Nevada will begin.

In the Bureau of Reclamation's 24-month forecast in 2014, they were not forecasting such dire declines. But, seven or eight years ago, the current state of water levels in Lake Mead and Lake Powell were not even imagined. When water levels in Lake Mead fall below 1,000 feet a second Las Vegas intake will run dry. Lake Powell is even more problematic. A 100 foot drop in the water level there , causing a serious problem at the Glen Powell hydroelectric plant. Some 350 thousand homes to lose electrical power.

Agriculture, from California's Imperial Valley to Wyoming's cattle kingdom, sops up 75% of the Colorado's water (and produces 15% of the nation's food). Forty million consumers depend on Lake Mead, the Colorado and its tributaries, for their drinking water as the water levels shrink. In the 1960s California's US Representatives and Senators negotiated priority rights to Lower Basin water for supporting the federal legislation that built the Central Arizona Project which constructed a network of canals that irrigated the farmlands and provided drinking water for Arizona's cities. If the drought in the Southwest gets worse, and Lake Mead continues to fall, Arizona stands to lose over half of its Colorado River water before California loses a drop. From that point, agriculture will no longer be a viable industry in Arizona. And, throughout much of the Southwestern United States, artificial turf will replace grass.

In central California the farms are experiencing an even worse drought than the farmlands in the upper basin of the Colorado. Without sufficient water to grow crops, or water for the livestock, scores of farms and dairy operations throughout California have already been forced to shut down. Water rationing had already begun along the San Juan. The States in the Upper Colorado Basin are already anticipating both State and federal laws to limit water consumption (by referring to it as "excessive water consumption.").

Studies show that the winding Colorado and it bounty of interconnected man-made reservoirs in both the Upper and Lower Basins will get drier each year. In the 1960s, when the US federal government (and the technological super powers) covertly initiated stratospheric aerosol geo-engineering (global climate modification) to prevent, or slow down—what they claimed they believed (but really knew better)—that man was causing global warming when, in reality, they knew that climate change, whether warming or cooling, was initially caused by the solar cycles of the sun.

Why would governments pretend that global warming is caused by man when every high-ranking bureaucrat in the world knew, at least from the birth of NASA and NOAA, that the temperature departures on Earth are the same as the temperature departures on Venus and Mars? Because from the 1950s and 60s man was already tinkering with scheme to modify weather. Man has never been satisfied with his lot in life, nor with the Edenic world God provided for mankind.

The theory of global warming, postulated as fact, was first advanced by Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius claimed in 1896, without any factual evidence, that fossil fuel combustion would result in global warming. Arrhenius and his associate, Thomas Chamberlain decided there existed a relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations and temperature. They determined that the average surface temperature of the earth is about 15C because of the infrared absorption capacity of H2O and CO2. Arrhenius suggested a doubling of the CO2 concentration would lead to a 5C temperature rise. He and Chamberlin decided that human exertion would raise the body temperature and the temperature of the Earth itself by adding carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. This voodoo science was adopted in 1962 by eco-wacko Paul Ehrlich who wrote the book, Population Bomb (a plagiarized clone of Thomas Malthus' early 18th century An Essay on the Principle of Population.) Global Warming and sweaty people were popularized by Al Gore in his 1987 book, Earth In The Balance. Gore used Arrhenius' fairy tale that human exertion causes global warming as fact.

What scientists intended to achieve when they began spewing fables about people causing global warming was to blame the people who weren't at fault for what the scientists weren't telling us. Or, rather, who's really to blame what what they are telling us—the results of studies that are now surfacing in scientific journals and on the evening news which appear to confirm not only the changes now occurring in Earth's climate and life support systems, but who's responsible for those very frightening changes in Earth's eco-systems. According to the eco-wacko politicians in this country, humanity (us, not them) has been deciminating not only the climate, but the ecosystem itself in scores of ways, being careful not to identify government's Siamese twin ties to the invisible thousand ton elephant in the room named SAG (aka Strategic Aerosol Geo-engineering). If you think I'm wrong, start digging around in the US Patent Office and see just how many patents exist for weather modification devises whose stated purpose is to slow down global warming. The problem is, as I've noted in scores of articles on this website, global warming is not caused by humans, it's caused by the sun. And global warming, like global cooling, is cyclic. Each cycle is 11 years in length. What goes around always comes back around every 22 years or so.

Yet, every patent application for every climate modification stratospheric aerosol contains tens of millions of aluminum/alumina nanoparticles together with barium and other toxic metallic nanoparticles that are dispersed in the form of chemical trails (chemtrails) from jet planes for the specific purpose of blocking the beneficial rays of the sun from reaching the ground, creating a grayish-blue haze that blocks direct sunlight.

The purpose of salting the sky with billions of alumina-barium nanoparticles is to create artificial cloud cover that ecowacko scientists believe will reduce global warming through atmospheric aerosol saturation. What is happening is this: our atmosphere is shrinking, we are now facing a hydrological cycle crisis which begins with the evaporation of water from the surface of the ocean. As moist air is lifted, it cools and water vapor condenses to form clouds. Moisture is transported around the globe until it returns to the surface as precipitation.)

The problem with stratospheric aerosol geo-engineering is that it greatly disrupts wind patterns and reduces precipitation causing the very droughts we're witnessing in the Southwest United States—in unprecedented levels. Because instead of controlling weather, the hydrological cycles are more unpredictable, causing torrential rains in areas which usually only experience moderate storms as the rain which was headed somewhere else is diverted due to massive haze clouds containing little or no moisture, and blanket entire countries or even continents with a silvery haze.

Blocking the sun reduces evaporation and convection from the ground which should occur when the sun rises and ground moisture evaporates and return to the lower cloud layers, moves on and drops as rain somewhere else. When Earth's natural weather patterns are disrupted and/or altered by climate engineers meddling with Mother Nature, bad things happen. Energy builds in the biosphere and one of three things usually happens: catastrophic rain storms or blizzards, or catastrophic droughts, or wind current changes which can trigger catastrophic underwater methane hydrate releases (which allows the sun's thermal energy to enter our atmosphere, but won't let it escape.) .And, finally, wind current changes trigger ocean current changes.

I'm sure you remember Hurricane Irene on Aug. 20-28, 2011 and Hurricane Sandy on Oct. 22-31, 2012. Like almost every hurricane during Solar Cycle 24, Irene and Sandy began their American odyssey in the Caribbean, heading for the Gulf of Mexico. But the ocean current changed the direction of their journey as they headed for the Gulf of Mexico. They veered and went up the Atlantic coastline instead. Hurricane Joaquin did the same thing. Joaquin, an October storm, smashed into Bermuda, and like Irene and Sandy, flipped north into the Atlantic, running parallel to the US coastline.on its way, it appeared, to New York instead of seeking out the warmer waters in the Gulf of Mexico. But, it moved out to sea heading to Europe, and dying in the Mid-Atlantic.

At the same time, three Pacific category 4 hurricanes: Kilo, Ignacio, and Jaime were bearing down on Hawaii. The directions of all of these storms were determined by ecowackos practicing the art of stratospheric aerosol geo-engineering. Every person, corporation or environmental foundation which has even so much as filed a patent application for anything even remotely associated with stratospheric aerosol geo-engineering needs to be imprisoned for life. Eco-idiots should never be allowed to experiment with the Earth's ecosystem, particularly when global warming and cooling are determined by the sun and not by flatulating cows, a sweating humanity, or Al Gore's convenient lies disguised as An Inconvenient Truth. Welcome to the Aerosol Age of Chicken Little and the soon-coming end of Planet Earth.